Smith v. AFSCME Council 4 et al
| Wanda A. Smith |
| AFSCME Council 4 and AFSCME Intl |
| 3:2008cv01735 |
| November 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Hartford |
| Robert N. Chatigny |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
RULING and ORDER granting 224 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 228 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/17/12. (Goldsticker, M)
|
|
Filing
215
RULING AND ORDER re: Doc. #190 plaintiff's objection to Doc. #188 Order. 8 Pages. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 8/12/11. (Nichols, J.)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 162 Motion to Preclude; denying 169 Motion to Strike; denying 171 Motion to Strike; denying 171 Motion for Default Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 172 Motion to Preclude; denying 172 Motion to Strike; granting 183 Motion for Extension of Time. See attached ruling for new deadlines. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 5/13/11. (Turner, M.)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER granting 107 Motion to Strike with leave to amend; granting in part and denying in part 114 Motion to Strike, 114 Motion to Preclude, 134 Motion to Preclude, and 134 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 1/31/11. (Turner, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
