Biggs v. Metro-North Commuter RR
Plaintiff: Christopher Biggs
Defendant: Metro-North Commuter RR
Case Number: 3:2009cv00629
Filed: April 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Mark R. Kravitz
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 189 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's 187 Objection to the Order allowing Costs 181 . The Court awards Defendant costs in the amount of $5,561.66. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/30/2013.(Smith, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Biggs v. Metro-North Commuter RR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Biggs
Represented By: Michael Flynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metro-North Commuter RR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?