Richard Parks Corrosion Tech Inc v. Plas-Pak Indus Inc et al
| Richard Parks Corrosion Tech Inc |
| Plas-Pak Indus Inc, V.O. Baker Co Inc, Thomas Baker and Jason Baker |
| 3:2010cv00437 |
| March 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
242
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 180 Plas-Pak's First Motion in Limine; denying 181 Plas-Pak's Second Motion in Limine; granting 194 the Baker Defendants' Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/29/2015. (Dearing, S.)
|
|
Filing
219
Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Victor A. Bolden: Motion Hearing held on 2/13/2015 re 180 First MOTION to Preclude [in limine] Evidence of Plaintiff's "CUTPA Disgorgement Damages" filed by Plas-Pak Indus Inc, 194 MOTION in Limine Defendant Counterclaim-Plaintiff V.O. Baker Company's And Defendants Jason Baker's And Thomas Baker's Motion In Limine No. 1 To Exclude The Expert Witness Testimony Of Michael DiGiacomo filed by VO Baker Co Inc, Jason Baker, Thomas Baker, 181 SEALED MOTION filed by Plas-Pak Indus Inc ; Status Conference held on 2/13/2015. Taking under advisement 180 Motion to Preclude; taking under advisement 181 Sealed Motion; taking under advisement 194 Motion in Limine. Total Time: 1 hour (Court Reporter Sharon Montini.) (Ghilardi, K.)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER denying 153 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plas-Pak Indus Inc. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 3/27/14. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 10/26/2012. (Candee, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
