Pirrotti v. Respironics, Inc et al
| Andrea Pirrotti |
| Western Cape Direct, LLC and Respironics, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv00439 |
| March 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Janet C. Hall |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
RULING granting 178 Motion for Reconsideration, 178 Motion for Clarification; denying 183 Motion to Disqualify Counsel.. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/12/2013. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
176
RULING denying 126 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 143 Motion to substitute pages; terminating as moot 152 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/28/2013. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 123 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 130 Motion for Extension of Time ; granting in part and denying in part 131 Motion to Compel. Please see attached Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 7/30/2012. (Garcia, M.)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 54 Motion for Protective Order; finding as moot 60 Motion to Compel. See attached Order. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 10/4/2011. (Garcia, M.)
|
|
Filing
52
RULING granting 28 Motion to Strike ; denying 28 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/6/2011. (Oliver, T.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
