Sprague v. Mapei Corporation
Plaintiff: Town of Sprague
Defendant: Mapei Corporation
Case Number: 3:2011cv00890
Filed: June 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New London
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 RULING granting 32 Motion to Dismiss; granting 27 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is instructed to file an amended complaint consistent with this ruling within 15 days of this ruling's filing date. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 5/24/2012. (Candee, D.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sprague v. Mapei Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Town of Sprague
Represented By: Jon B. Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mapei Corporation
Represented By: Robert Stuart Ludlum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?