Fabula v. American Medical Response, Inc.
| Paul Fabula and USA |
| American Medical Response, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv00921 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Michael P. Shea |
| False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
186
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, plaintiff's 178 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Court's October 4, 2019 Order (ECF No. 183) is modified as follows: within 14 days of this order, the parties shall file a revised Rule 26(f) Report to identify appropriate topics for further discovery, to propose a reasonably abbreviated period to complete such discovery, and to propose a schedule for trial. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/5/2019. (Hausmann, Amy)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, AMR's 144 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Fabula's 157 Rule 56(d) Motion is DENIED. AMR's 143 motion to exclude the report and testimony of Edwa rd T. Dickinson is DENIED as moot.Because the motion for summary judgment following Phase I discovery is denied in part, the parties may seek additional discovery on the remaining claims. The Court orders the parties to file a revised Rule 26 (f) Report within 14 days of this Order to identify appropriate topics for further discovery, to propose a reasonably abbreviated period to complete any such discovery, and to propose a schedule for trial.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/16/2019. (Hausmann, Amy)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER. The Court's rulings on the parties' discovery disputes are stated in the attached document. In light of these rulings, the 131 motion for an extension of the deadlines in the Second Amended Scheduling Order is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Phase I discovery deadline shall be extended by 30 days to October 12, 2018. Defendant shall then have 30 days to file any dispositive motion based on Phase I discovery (due by November 12, 2018). Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/12/2018. (Attachments: (1) Plaintiff-Relator's Discovery Letter and Addendum; (2) Defendant's Discovery Letter) (Guevremont, Nathan)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER: See attached discovery order. Any motion to compel shall be filed by no later than 9/4/2018. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 8/13/2018.(Greenspoon, L.)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER. For the reasons discussed in the attached, the 105 Motion to Amend is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a response to the Fourth Amended Complaint by January 17, 2018. In light of the 114 Joint Status Report, the telephonic status conference currently scheduled for January 8, 2018 is CANCELED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/3/2018. (Taykhman, N.)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER. As set forth herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant's 77 Motion to Dismiss, and the Clerk is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/6/15. (Bradley, K.)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER. The Court GRANTS Defendant's 40 motion to dismiss Count One but stays this portion of its ruling for thirty (30) days to allow the bankruptcy trustee to appear and prosecute Mr. Fabula's claims, if he wishes to do so. The Court GRANTS AMR's motion to dismiss Mr. Fabula's Count Two with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/4/15. (Bradley, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
