Estate of Edwin Cephus Thomas et al v. Wakefern Food Corp et al
| Cecelia Thomas and Estate of Edwin Cephus Thomas |
| Wakefern Food Corp, Elias Londono, Costamar Leasing & SRS. Corp. and Estate of Jennifer Edwards |
| 3:2012cv01723 |
| December 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Charles S. Haight |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER: (see attached) - Given that 1 Plaintiff's Complaint does not sufficiently establish diversity among the parties under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), Plaintiff is directed to submit evidence to the Court not later than January 25, 2013 rebutting the inference that complete diversity does not exist (as specified in the attached Order), failing which the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Such an order of dismissal would be marked "without prejudice,&quo t; leaving Plaintiff free to assert Plaintiff's claims in a state court of competent jurisdiction. Alternatively, at any time prior to January 25, 2013, Plaintiff may file a notice of voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), which dismissal would also be without prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 12/13/12. (Hornstein, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
