Ghawi v. Law firm Howard L. Schiff, P.C. et al
| Nabil Ghawi |
| Law firm Howard L. Schiff, P.C., Jeanine M. Dumont, Heath A. Tiberio, Rebecca Jadach and Quaneshia Dailey-Thompson |
| 3:2013cv00115 |
| January 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
214
NOTICE OF SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL OF CUTPA CLAIM: In light of the Court's dismissal of Mr. Ghawi's CUTPA claim to the extent it rested on losses other than monetary losses in the form of phone charges, and the Court's finding that Mr. Gha wi has introduced no evidence that he in fact received phone charges, the Court hereby notifies the parties of its intent to sua sponte dismiss the CUTPA claim (Count V of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint). The parties' responses, if any, shall be filed no later than February 5, 2016 at 5 p.m. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/3/16. (Harris, J)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER: Defendant's Motion 196 to Amend is DENIED and Plaintiff's Motion 190 In Limine to Bar Reference to the Statute of Limitations is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/21/16. (Harris, J)
|
|
Filing
206
ENDORSEMENT ORDER granting in part and denying in part 191 Motion in Limine and setting out the Court's orders on the motions in limine and objections contained in the Joint Trial Memorandum. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/6/16. (Harris, J)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER: Mr. Ghawi's Motion 89 for Summary Judgment is DENIED; Citibank's Motion 154 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Mr. Ghawi's claims about calls made by Citibank itself and DENIED with respect to Mr. Ghawi's c laims based on calls made by the HLS Defendants; and the HLS Defendants' Motion 102 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's FDCPA §§ 1692d(6) and e(1) claims and otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 11/10/15. (Harris, J)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER: The HLS Defendants' Motion 152 to Strike is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/21/15. (Harris, J)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER: Citibank's Motion 106 to Amend/Correct is GRANTED; Citibank's Motion 129 to Strike is GRANTED; Citibank's Motion 130 to Strike is GRANTED as to the substance of the Objection and DENIED as to the attached telephone records. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/11/15. (Harris, J)
|
|
Filing
96
RULING (see attached) denying in large part 78 Defendant Citibank's Motion for Protective Order; granting in part 80 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 85 Plaintiff's Motion for Compliance by the HLS Defendants; and granting in part 90 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 5/18/2015. (Watson, M.)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: Defendants' Motion 60 to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The following claims are dismissed in their entirety: (1) 47 U.S.C. § 227(e); (2) TILA, 15 U.S.C. § 1643(b); (3) Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341; (4) &q uot;Unconscionability"; (5) "Misconduct"; (6) C.G.S. § 16-256e; (7) RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.; (8) FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692b(1) & (3), 1692e(2), and 1692f(1); (9) Connecticut TILA, C.G.S. § 36a-681; and ( 10) C.G.S. § 42-288a. In addition, all claims under the FDCPA and CUTPA are dismissed as to Defendant Citibank. The remaining claims-(1) FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692c(a)(1), 1692d(5) & (6), 1692e(10), and 1692g(b) as to HLS and HLS employees; (2) TCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b) as to all Defendants; and (3) CUTPA, C.G.S. § 42-110 et seq. as to HLS and HLS employees-are not dismissed. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/1/14. (Harris, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
