Findley v. USA

Petitioner: Andrew Findley
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2013cv00462
Filed: April 3, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Alvin W. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 14, 2015 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (Doc. No. 1 ) is hereby DENIED for the reasons set forth in the attached document. The Clerk shall close this case. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 10/14/15. (Mata, E.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Findley v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew Findley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: John H. Durham
Represented By: David B. Fein
Represented By: Peter D. Markle
Represented By: Christopher W. Schmeisser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?