Behr Thermot-Tronik GmbH et al v. Leipold, Inc.

Plaintiff: Behr Thermot-Tronik Prettl Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Behr Thermot-Tronik GmbH
Defendant: Leipold, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00666
Filed: May 9, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Stefan R. Underhill
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Behr Thermot-Tronik GmbH et al v. Leipold, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Behr Thermot-Tronik Prettl Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Represented By: Robert Reginald Simpson
Represented By: Andrew M. Zeitlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Behr Thermot-Tronik GmbH
Represented By: Andrew M. Zeitlin
Represented By: Robert Reginald Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leipold, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher S Antoci
Represented By: Anthony B. Corleto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.