McGrath v. Court Support Services

McGrath v. Court Support Services

Petitioner:	John McGrath
Respondent:	Court Support Services
Case Number:	3:2014cv00015
Filed:	January 7, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Hartford
Presiding Judge:	Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 19, 2016	Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. # 1 ) is DISMISSED, and respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 13 ) is GRANTED. Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), no certificate of appealability shall enter. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of respondent and to close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/19/2016. (Gruber, Sarah)
June 22, 2015	Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (1) the respondent shall file a response on or before July 31, 2015 why the relief prayed for in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted (2) the Clerk shall serve this petition by delivering a copy of this ord er and a copy of the petition and all attachments to respondent's representative, Jo Anne Sulik, Supervisory Assistant State's Attorney, Office of the Chief State's Attorney, on or before June 30, 2015. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the decision to the pro se plaintiff. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/22/2015. (Oakes, A.)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 19, 2016

Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. # 1 ) is DISMISSED, and respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 13 ) is GRANTED. Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), no certificate of appealability shall enter. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of respondent and to close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/19/2016. (Gruber, Sarah)

June 22, 2015

Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (1) the respondent shall file a response on or before July 31, 2015 why the relief prayed for in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted (2) the Clerk shall serve this petition by delivering a copy of this ord er and a copy of the petition and all attachments to respondent's representative, Jo Anne Sulik, Supervisory Assistant State's Attorney, Office of the Chief State's Attorney, on or before June 30, 2015. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the decision to the pro se plaintiff. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/22/2015. (Oakes, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGrath v. Court Support Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: John McGrath
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Court Support Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?