Fleming v. Besse
Plaintiff: Douglas P. Fleming
Defendant: James Besse
Case Number: 3:2014cv01341
Filed: September 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Windham
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Haight
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding as moot 24 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/3/2016. (Dearing, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleming v. Besse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas P. Fleming
Represented By: Gregory F. Arcaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Besse
Represented By: Michelle Lynn McConaghy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?