CSL Silicones, Inc v. Midsun Group Inc
Plaintiff: CSL Silicones, Inc
Defendant: Midsun Group Inc
Case Number: 3:2014cv01897
Filed: December 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Haight
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 319 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (see attached). The parties should exchange and file main briefs addressing the questions and issues raised in the attached Memorandum on or before September 17, 2018. Reply briefs should be exchanged and filed no later than September 24, 2018. The Court will hear oral argument on September 26, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. A separate calendar will issue. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 8/3/2018. (Kaczmarek, S.)
March 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 213 RULING (see attached). For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, CSL's 170 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; CSL's 120 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Midsun 's 163 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and for Judicial Notice is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and Midsun's 160 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. The parties are directed to file a joint trial memorandum in the form required by this Court's Standing Order Regarding Trial Memoranda in Civil Cases on or before May 14, 2018. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 3/15/2018. (Kaczmarek, S.)
December 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 204 RULING (see attached). For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, Plaintiff CSL Silicones, Inc.'s 166 Motion to Exclude Defendant's Proposed Expert on Likelihood of Confusion is GRANTED IN PART. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 12/7/2017. (Kaczmarek, S.)
April 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 173 RULING (see attached) regarding Plaintiff's [Docs. 82-83]. For the reasons stated in the attached Ruling, Defendant is ORDERED to transmit to Plaintiff $15,705 in attorneys' fees. Defendant is further directed to certify with the Court, in the form of an affidavit, its full compliance with the terms of this Ruling on or before June 16, 2017. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 18, 2017. (Kahl, A)
June 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 81 RULING (see attached) denying Defendant's 60 Renewed Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 27, 2016. (White, B.)
April 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting defendant's 61 Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order, and denying plaintiff's 62 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. The Court hereby enters the following Amended Scheduling Order: fact discovery due by October 31, 2016; all discovery, including expert depositions, due by November 30, 2016; dispositive motions due by December 13, 2016. See attached Order for other interim deadlines. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/1/2016. (Katz, S.)
March 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 RULING (see attached) GRANTING Defendant's 11 Motion for Judicial Notice and GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss. As discussed in the attached Ruling, at 22-23, the Court also DENIES WITH OUT PREJUDICE Defendant's 39 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Defendant's 40 Motion for Protective Order. The parties are directed to confer regarding the status of the issues related to the latter two motions, and, if Defendant so chooses, it may re-file either or both motions on or before March 25, 2016. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 15, 2016. (White, B.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CSL Silicones, Inc v. Midsun Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CSL Silicones, Inc
Represented By: Michael J. Rye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midsun Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?