Schuman v. Aetna Life Ins Co et al
| Jeff Schuman |
| Aetna Life Ins Co, Ahold USA, Inc. Master Welfare Benefit Plan and Plan Administrator |
| 3:2015cv01006 |
| July 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER denying 113 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 115 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 7/9/2019. (Smith, E)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER denying 91 Supplemental MOTION for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/16/2017. (Jamieson, K)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 85 MOTION for Attorney Fees. The motion is granted up to the amount of $38,627.50, and otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/20/2017. (Jamieson, K)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 62 Motion for Civil Penalties; denying 69 Motion for Costs regarding the Motion for Civil Penalties. The de fendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part with respect to Schuman's equitable claims and denied in part, insofar as they have not shown that there is no genuine dispute of material fact regarding either the appropriate standa rd of review for the claims determination or whether the determination should be affirmed under any standard. Schuman's cross-motion for summary judgment is also denied. Schuman's motion for civil penalties is denied, and the Administrative Committee's motion for costs in defending that motion is also denied.Because the Administrative Record does not provide me with sufficient evidence to determine whether the "reasonable occupation" standard has been correctly applied, however, I grant the defendants' alternative request for remand for further consideration of that issue.Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/20/2017. (Buttrick, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
