Shehan v. Erfe et al
| Joe Lewis Shehan |
| Erfe, Marten, Williams, Champion, Conger, Norfleet, Ruggiero, Clapper, King and Sokolowski |
| 3:2015cv01315 |
| September 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Tolland |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Champion's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 69] is DENIED. Defendants' 67 Motion to Seal is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/4/2017. (Connelly, L.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER. The defendants' 59 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to claims except the excessive force claim and assault and battery claims against defendants Norfleet, Ruggiero, Champion, and Conger regarding the application of in-cell res traints to the plaintiff. Within sixty days of this order, defendants Champion and Conger may file a motion for summary judgment as to the issue of their personal involvement, as described above. If they determine not to file such a motion, they sh all file a statement so indicating within forty-five days of the date of this order. The Court is unlikely to extend these deadlines.All remaining deadlines in the case are adjusted as follows. If Defendants Conger and Champion file a secon d motion for summary judgment, then the joint trial memorandum will be due within 45 days of the Court's ruling on that motion. If not, the joint trial memorandum will be due within 45 days of the filing by defense counsel of the statement indi cating that he does not intend to file another summary judgment motion.The Court will suspend these deadlines if the parties jointly indicate they wish to proceed to mediation with a magistrate judge. Should they wish to do so at this junctu re, the parties shall, within 21 days of this order, file a joint statement certifying that (1) the parties have conferred with each other (through counsel, in the case of the defendants), (2) the parties wish to proceed to mediation, (3) the parties are willing to participate in settlement efforts at such mediation in good faith, and (4) the parties and counsel believe that a mediation stands at least a reasonable chance of resolving the case without trial. The Court will then refer the case for mediation before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Martinez.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/4/2017. (Connelly, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
