Morgan v. Semple et al
| Lloyd George Morgan, Jr. |
| Scott S. Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel A. Quiros, Peter Murphy, Karl Lewis, Antonio Santiago, Robert A. Martin, Jeffrey Zegarzewski, Conger, Dougherty, James Shabenas, Williams, Rivard, Comitos, Senita, Duquette, Thomas Weglarz, Matthew Morin, Scully, Fulcher, Barstow, White, Elizabeth Coursen, Gina Higgins, Jane Doe, Beth A. Shaw, Michael McDonald, Allen Wood, Carol Chapdelaine, G. Mudano, Guadarama, Claudio and Landolina |
| 3:2016cv00225 |
| February 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
CORRECTED ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the Court DENIES the 114 motion to dismiss as to Mr. Morgan's claims for First Amendment retaliation against Defendants Morin, Rivard, Comitos, Senita, Weglarz, Scully, Co nger, Coursen, and Higgins; the deliberate indifference claim against Defendants Rivard, Comitos, Senita, Scully, Fulcher, Morin, Coursen, Higgins, Semple, Rinaldi, Santiago, Zegarzewski, Shabanas, and Conger; the claim of supervisory liability again st Defendants Semple, Rinaldi, Santiago, Zegarzewski, Shebanas, and Conger; and the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim.The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss as to the Fourth Amendment claim; the claim for negligent infliction of emotional d istress; and the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendants Rivard, Comtois, Senita, Weglarz, Scully, Fulcher, Morin, Coursen, and Higgins. The Court has corrected the last line of section III.K. It now states that the claims against the supervisory Defendants will not be dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to vacate the Court's previous 145 Order. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/6/2020.(Garcia, A.)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 114 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss as to Mr. Morgan's claims for First Amendment retaliation against Defendant s Morin, Rivard, Comitos, Senita, Weglarz, Scully, Conger, Coursen, and Higgins; the deliberate indifference claim against Defendants Rivard, Comitos, Senita, Scully, Fulcher, Morin, Coursen, Higgins, Semple, Rinaldi, Santiago, Zegarzewski, Shabanas, and Conger; the claim of supervisory liability against Defendants Semple, Rinaldi, Santiago, Zegarzewski, Shebanas, and Conger; and the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim.The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss as to the Fourth Amendm ent claim; the claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress; and the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendants Rivard, Comtois, Senita, Weglarz, Scully, Fulcher, Morin, Coursen, and Higgins. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 4/24/2020. (Garcia, A.)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER denying 95 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons stated in the attached order, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/24/2020. (Garcia, A.)
|
|
Filing
8
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER re 1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 02/23/2016. (LaPre, E.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
