McAuliffe et al v. McAuliffe et al
| McAuliffe, Katherine McAuliffe and Kathleen McAuliffe |
| Timothy McAuliffe, Gay Murdoch, Timothy Bailey, Kevin McAuliffe and Gloria M. Cady |
| 3:2016cv01152 |
| July 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Approved. So ORDERED re #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Kathleen McAuliffe, Katherine McAuliffe. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/13/2017. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Glynn, T.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Moyher, Thomas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: On 12/1/2016, the Court ordered plaintiffs to file a memorandum on or before 12/15/2016 showing why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). There has been no response to the order. Plaintiffs are hereby notified that unless the memorandum is filed on or before 6/13/2016, this action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notification. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/6/2017. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: More than 120 have elapsed since the complaint was filed but plaintiffs have not made proof of service as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(1). Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby ordered to file a memorandum on or before December 15, 2016, showing why this action should not be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/1/2016.(Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES : Counsel or pro se parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Kathleen McAuliffe, Katherine McAuliffe, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Kathleen McAuliffe, Katherine McAuliffe, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Protective Order. Signed by Clerk on 7/12/16. (Sundie, T) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher T. Parkin on behalf of Katherine McAuliffe, Kathleen McAuliffe (Parkin, Christopher) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/11/16. (Sundie, T)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/11/16. (Attachments: #1 E-File Attachment) (Sundie, T)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/9/2016. Discovery due by 1/10/2017. Signed by Clerk on 7/11/16. (Sundie, T)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Katherine McAuliffe, Kathleen McAuliffe.(Basha, D.) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Walker, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
