Schipke v. Fulcher

Schipke v. Fulcher

Petitioner:	Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Respondent:	Steve Fulcher
Case Number:	3:2016cv02096
Filed:	December 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	New London
Presiding Judge:	Janet C. Hall
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 18, 2017	Filing 17 RULING: For the reasons set forth herein, the Petition (Doc. No. 1 ) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. The Motions (Doc. Nos. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 14 ) seeking various forms of injunctive relief are TERMINATED AS MOOT, to the extent they seek relief rela ted to allegedly unlawful prison conditions, and DISMISSED without prejudice, to the extent they seek injunctive relief that is not cognizable in conjunction with a habeas petition or raise claims over which this court does not have subject matter ju risdiction.The court concludes that jurists of reason would not find it debatable that the relief sought in the Petition is moot or that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over at least one of the claims. Thus, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/18/2017. (Lewis, D)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 18, 2017

Filing 17 RULING: For the reasons set forth herein, the Petition (Doc. No. 1 ) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. The Motions (Doc. Nos. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 14 ) seeking various forms of injunctive relief are TERMINATED AS MOOT, to the extent they seek relief rela ted to allegedly unlawful prison conditions, and DISMISSED without prejudice, to the extent they seek injunctive relief that is not cognizable in conjunction with a habeas petition or raise claims over which this court does not have subject matter ju risdiction.The court concludes that jurists of reason would not find it debatable that the relief sought in the Petition is moot or that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over at least one of the claims. Thus, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/18/2017. (Lewis, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schipke v. Fulcher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Fulcher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?