Veilleux v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company et al
| Eric Veilleux |
| Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company and Nautilus Insurance Company |
| 3:2016cv02116 |
| December 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached order, the portions of the Court's prior summary judgment ruling discussing the Motor Carrier Act endorsement and the hired auto endorsement, ECF No. 99 at Sections IV.A.1 and IV.A.2, are VACATED and because the case has been fully resolved, the case is DISMISSED. The Clerk is instructed to close the case. The parties may file any motion to reopen within 30 days. This deadline may be extended for good cause shown. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/24/20.(Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Progressive's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 81) is hereby DENIED. In light of this disposition, the 92 redacted version of the motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/13/2018. (Self, A.)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the 21 motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/18/2018. (Self, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
