Anderson v. New Britain et al
| Michael Anderson |
| City of New Britain, Rejean Ouelette, Devin Saylor and Pergolizza |
| 3:2017cv00311 |
| February 22, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
RULING AND ORDER: The Order granting Mr. Andersons Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF No. 13 , is VACATED. Mr. Andersons Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF No. 2 , is DENIED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The pending motions, ECF Nos. 29 , 30 , and 34 are DENIED without prejudice. All further proceedings in this matter shall be held in abeyance for twenty (20) days pending Mr. Anderson's delivery of the filing fee in the amount of $400.00. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/29/2018.(Giammatteo, J.)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER finding as moot 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Michael Anderson, and 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Michael Anderson. Granting 8 MOTION for copy(s) filed by Michael Anderson to the limited extent that Mr. Anderson seeks a copy of his Complaint. INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: Discovery due by 3/8/2018, Dispositive Motions due by 4/7/2018)Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 8/7/2017.(Ghosh, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
