Lippmann et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Walter Lippmann and 36-38 North Water Street LLC |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
3:2017cv00918 |
June 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New Haven |
Victor A. Bolden |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 RULING AND ORDER REMANDING CASE: For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling and Order, this case is hereby DISMISSED AND REMANDED to the Connecticut Superior Court in the Judicial District of New Haven. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/1/2019. (Baran, Hugh) |
Filing 47 ORDER rejecting 44 Stipulation: For the reasons explained in the attached Order, the Court rejects Plaintiffs' stipulation, ECF No. 44. Plaintiffs may file a corrected, binding stipulation by March 4, 2019. If no such stipulation is filed, the Court will address the pending motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/26/2019. (Baran, Hugh) |
Filing 43 ORDER: As explained in the attached Order, because the jurisdictional threshold has not been clearly satisfied, if Plaintiffs wish to stipulate that the amount in controversy is less than $75,000 and wish to be bound by that stipulation, they must do so and file any such stipulation with the Court by February 15, 2019. See attached Order for details. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/25/2019. (Baran, Hugh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.