Wade v. Kay Jewelers Inc. et al
| Fabian Wade |
| Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc., GGP, Inc., Jane Does and John Does |
| 3:2017cv00990 |
| June 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, GGP's 97 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and PSC's 95 motion for summary judgment is DENIED as moot. GGP shall file on the docket within 21 days a short notice on what rel ief in its 57 third-party complaint it wishes to pursue in light of this ruling. If GGP indicates that it does not wish to continue pursuing any relief on its third-party complaint or does not respond by the deadline, the Court will dismiss the third-party complaint.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/27/2019. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Sterling's 42 and GGP's 45 motions to dismiss the 36 amended complaint are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The claims for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count One) and intenti onal infliction of emotional distress (Count Four) are DISMISSED in full. The defamation per se claim against GGP (Count Three) is DISMISSED. In addition, PSC's 70 motion to dismiss the 57 third-party complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. GGP's negligence claim (Count One) against PSC is DISMISSED. Finally, the Clerk is directed to terminate Kay Jewelers, Inc. as a defendant.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/17/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER. The 91 Motion to Amend for Leave to Amend Complaint is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the attached.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/24/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
