Stanley v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shaina Stanley
Defendant: A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv01215
Filed: July 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, defendant's 15 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Action is DENIED. The parties' joint Rule 26(f) report is due 14 days from the date of this ruling.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/15/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanley v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaina Stanley
Represented By: Daniel S. Blinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?