Skipp, et al. v. Brigham, et al.
| Susan Skipp, G.A.T. and W.G.T. |
| Mary Brigham and Mary Brigham Law LLC. |
| 3:2017cv01224 |
| July 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the 24 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to close this case. The clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order, return receipt requested, to Plaintiff, an d file proof of mailing and the return receipt on the docket. Finally, Ms. Skipp is hereby placed on notice that a further attempt to make any filing in this court (except a notice of appeal) related to the factual allegations raised in any of the cases dismissed in the attached ((i.e. Skipp et al. v. Brigham et al. (17-cv-01224), Skipp et al. v. Brigham et al. (17-cv-01761), and Skipp et al. v. Tittle et al. (17-cv-01569)) could result in the imposition of a leave-to-file injunction, which would prevent her from making further filings related to the allegations in these cases in this court without special permission. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/26/2017. (Self, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
