Vermont Mutual Insurance Co. v. Natiello et al
Vermont Mutual Insurance Co. |
Deborah Natiello, Timothy Sutera and Nathaniel Sutera |
Nathaniel Sutera and Timothy Sutera |
Vermont Mutual Insurance Co. |
3:2017cv02050 |
December 7, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Michael P. Shea |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER and CALENDAR: A settlement conference is scheduled with Judge Martinez on 6/23/20 at 1:00 pm. See attached order. The conference will be conducted through the Zoom videoconferencing application. Connection information will be emailed to counsel. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 70 ORDER. As set forth in the attached, the Counterclaim Plaintiffs have failed to produce evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude that the alleged misconduct constituted a general business practice. Because this is a necessary element of an unfair settlement practice claim under CUIPA--and, in the present context, a CUTPA claim--Counterclaim Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 67 ) as to Counts III and IV of the Counterclaims filed by each of the three Counterclaim Plaintiffs is GRANTED.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/26/2020. (Karpman, Michael) |
Filing 55 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the 17 motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/27/2018. (Self, A.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.