Kivett v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
| Christine Kivett |
| Aetna Life Insurance Company and Telos Corporation Welfare Plan |
| 3:2018cv01095 |
| June 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 06/28/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 06/28/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/27/2018. Discovery due by 12/28/2018. Dispositive Motions due by 2/1/2019. Signed by Clerk on 06/28/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Andrew S. Davis to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-4883612) by Christine Kivett. (Rintoul, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4883592.), filed by Christine Kivett.(Rintoul, David) |
| Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Rintoul, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
