Gorman v. LAZ Parking LTD, LLC
Laura Gorman |
LAZ Parking LTD, LLC |
3:2018cv01612 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Janet Bond Arterton |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2612 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until December 12, 2018 to Plead by LAZ Parking LTD, LLC. (Spagnola, Michael) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time, on consent, to 11/27/18. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/24/18. (Tooker, A.) |
Answer deadline updated for All Defendants. (Tooker, A.) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time until November 26, 2018 to Plead by LAZ Parking LTD, LLC. (Spagnola, Michael) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LAZ Parking LTD, LLC. (Spagnola, Michael) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael John Spagnola on behalf of LAZ Parking LTD, LLC (Spagnola, Michael) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laura Gorman. LAZ Parking LTD, LLC served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018. (Reilly, Michael) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *LAZ Parking LTD, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael John Reilly* *Cicchiello & Cicchiello, LLP* *364 Franklin Avenue* *Hartford, CT 06114*. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Laura Gorman Signed by Clerk on 9/27/2018.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 9/26/2018.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 9/26/2018.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/25/2018 Discovery due by 3/28/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 5/2/2019 Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 9/26/2018.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LAZ Parking Ltd., LLC ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4984686.), filed by Laura Gorman.(Reilly, Michael) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to LAZ Parking Ltd., LLC. (Reilly, Michael) |
Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gorman v. LAZ Parking LTD, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Laura Gorman | |
Represented By: | Michael John Reilly |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LAZ Parking LTD, LLC | |
Represented By: | Michael John Spagnola |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.