Lopez v. Semple et al
| Treizy Treizon Lopez |
| Lis, Kenneth Butricks, White, Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Garibaldi, Fortin, Mala, Eberle and Salvatore |
| 3:2018cv01907 |
| November 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Kenneth Butricks, Eberle, Fortin, Garibaldi, Mala, Salvatore* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Treizy Treizon Lopez #384377* *NORTHERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION* *287 Bilton Road, P.O. Box 665* *Somers, CT 06071*. (Fanelle, N.) |
| USM 285 forms together with Summons, Complaint, Order granting IFP reviewed and sent to USM for service on defendant(s).Marshals Return of Service on Summons due by 1/31/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
| REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Kenneth Butricks, Salvatore, Eberle, Mala, Fortin, Garibaldi on 1/11/2019 by Treizy Treizon Lopez. Waiver of Service due by 2/15/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 10
Standing Order re: Initial Discovery Disclosures Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 1/10/2019. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. See Attached Order. The Eighth Amendment claim for inhumane conditions of confinement may proceed against Salvatore, Fortin, and Butricks in their individual capacities for damages. The First Amendment retaliation claim may proceed against Garibaldi in his individual capacity for damages. The Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claim may proceed against Garibaldi, Mala, Salvatore, and Eberle in their individual capacities for damages and in their official capacities for injunctive relief. All other claims are dismissed. The Court is directed to terminate Semple, Maldonado, Lis, and White as Defendants to this action. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/4/19.(Dooley, Kari)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 12/5/2018. (Payton, R.)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Treizy Treizon Lopez. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 6 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Please submit the attached Prisoner's IFP application which is being sent to you by U.S. mail. The IFP application that was filed with the court is missing pages 2 & 4. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 12/20/2018 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/29/2018.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/23/2018. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 11/23/2018. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/23/2018. (Oliver, T.)
|
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Treizy Treizon Lopez. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Kenneth Butricks, Eberle, Fortin, Garibaldi, Lis, Mala, Edward Maldonado, filed by Treizy Treizon Lopez. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
