Orr v. Marquis et al
Anthony D. Orr |
Marquis, John Doe, Erfie and Jane Doe |
3:2018cv01908 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the Court hereby issues the following orders:(1) The Eighth Amendment claim for excessive force may proceed against Marquis, Rodriguez, Doe 1, and Doe 2 in their individual capacities for damages. All other claims are dismissed. The clerk is directed to terminate Nurse Doe and Warden Erfe as defendants to this action.(2)The Clerk shall verify the current work addresses for Marquis and Rodriguez with the DOC Office of Legal Affairs, mail a waiver of service of process request packet containing the complaint (ECF No. 1) to them at the confirmed addresses within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, and report to the Court on the status of the waiver requests on the thirty-fifth (35th) day after mailing. If either defendant fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall make arrangements for in-person service by the U.S. Marshals Service on him, and he shall be required to pay the costs of such service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d).(3)The Clerk shall send a courtesy copy of the complaint and this Order to the DOC Office of Legal Affairs.(4)Because the plaintiff has not identified John Does 1 and 2 by name, the Clerk is not able to serve a copy of the complaint on those defendants in their individual capacities. Within ninety (90) days from the date of this Order, the plaintiff shall file a notice indicating the first and last name of John Does 1 and 2. If the plaintiff files the notice, the Court will direct the Clerk to effect service of the complaint on those defendants in their individual capacities. If the plaintiff fails to identify John Does 1 and 2 within the time specified, the claims against those defendants will be dismissed.(5)Marquis and Rodriguez shall file their response to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the notice of lawsuit and waiver of service of summons forms are mailed to them. If they choose to file an answer, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claims recited above. They may also include any and all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules. (6)Discovery, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26-37, shall be completed within six months (180 days) from the date of this order. Discovery requests need not be filed with the Court.(7)All motions for summary judgment shall be filed within seven months (210 days) from the date of this order.(8)Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(a), a nonmoving party must respond to a dispositive motion within twenty-one (21) days of the date the motion was filed. If no response is filed, or the response is not timely, the dispositive motion can be granted absent objection.(9)If the plaintiff changes his address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Court Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that the plaintiff MUST notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of the case. The plaintiff must give notice of a new address even if he is incarcerated. The plaintiff should write PLEASE NOTE MY NEW ADDRESS on the notice. It is not enough to just put the new address on a letter without indicating that it is a new address. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/10/2019. (Ram, Megha) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at anytime during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 12/13/2018. (Payton, R.) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony D. Orr. (Payton, R.) |
Filing 6 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. You must submit the attached Prisoner's IFP application. The IFP application that was submitted to the court is incomplete(pg.2). Also you must submit a Ledger Sheet showing the past six months. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 12/21/2018 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/30/2018.(Payton, R.) |
Filing 5 PRISCS - STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 11/26/2018.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 PRISCS - STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/26/2018.(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 11/27/2018 to add prefix (Fazekas, J.). |
Filing 3 PRISCS - ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/26/2018.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony D. Orr. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Jane Doe, John Doe(C/O (Cheshire C.I.)), Erfie, Marquis, filed by Anthony D. Orr.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.