Padilla v. 5th Cir Court of Appls CT et al
| Ismael H. Padilla |
| 5th Cir Court of Appls CT, U.S. Dist. Court, United States Supreme CT and United States Supreme Court |
| 3:2019cv00282 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Charles S Haight |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Victor A. Bolden for all further proceedings Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 4/10/19.(Pesta, J.)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. You must submit the attached Prisoner's IFP application which is being sent to you via U.S. mail If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 3/27/2019 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/6/2019.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 2/25/2019.(Pipech, L.)
|
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ismael H. Padilla. (Pipech, L.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against 5th Cir Court of Appls CT, U.S. Dist. Court, United States Supreme CT, filed by Ismael H. Padilla. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Pipech, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
