Moore-Callands v. Danbury
| Marlene Moore-Callands |
| City Of Danbury |
| 3:2019cv00312 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alfred V Covello |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 10, 2019 to file a response to Plaintif's Complaint by City Of Danbury. (Zelman, Johanna) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jenna M Goldman on behalf of City Of Danbury (Goldman, Jenna) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: discovery due by 11/27/2019; dispositive motions due by 12/25/2019; trial brief due by 1/22/2020; trial ready date 2/19/2020. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 4/15/19. (Covello, Alfred)
|
| Filing 9 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Van Katwyk, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Danielle Van Katwyk on behalf of City Of Danbury (Van Katwyk, Danielle) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Johanna G. Zelman on behalf of City Of Danbury (Zelman, Johanna) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Waiver of Service Executed filed by Marlene Moore-Callands, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Marlene Moore-Callands, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, and #1 Complaint filed by Marlene Moore-Callands. Signed by Clerk on 3/5/2019.(Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 3/4/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/3/2019. Discovery due by 9/3/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 10/8/2019. Signed by Clerk on 3/4/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to City of Danbury waiver sent on 3/4/2019, answer due 5/3/2019 filed by Marlene Moore-Callands. (Williams, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Williams on behalf of Marlene Moore-Callands (Williams, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Danbury ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5179328.), filed by Marlene Moore-Callands.(Williams, John) |
| Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore-Callands v. Danbury | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marlene Moore-Callands | |
| Represented By: | John R. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City Of Danbury | |
| Represented By: | Johanna G. Zelman |
| Represented By: | Danielle Van Katwyk |
| Represented By: | Jenna M Goldman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
