Miller v. Stallworth et al
| Stephen A. Miller |
| Maria Satterwhite-Porpora, ABRI and Charles Stallworth |
| 3:2019cv00484 |
| April 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Charles S Haight |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER (attached), denying as MOOT Plaintiff's #17 #20 motions and PERMANENTLY ENJOINING Plaintiff from bringing any future case as a self-represented plaintiff in the District of Connecticut without prior permission and filing papers in connection with any case previously filed or currently pending in the District of Connecticut. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 07/15/2019. (Chen, C.)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Order by Stephen A. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Reis, Julia) |
| Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT of Service: Service Unexecuted as to Charles Stallworth per Order #13 (Reis, Julia) |
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT of Service: Service Unexecuted as to ABRI per Order #13 (Reis, Julia) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Correct by Stephen A. Miller. Responses due by 7/11/2019 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 16
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's #14 Motion to Expose Hypnosis & Destroyed Evidence Punishment from a $20,000 Bond Violated the 8th Amendment. It is unclear exactly what relief Plaintiff is seeking, but he also asks in his motion to transfer his case assigned to Judge Arterton. Doc. #14 at 1. Plaintiff has also filed #15 A Revised Complaint of Severe Judicial Branch Injustice & Conspiracy This is Now a Landmark Case.In an order dated June 6, 2019, the court dismissed Plaintiff's #1 Complaint with prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. Doc. #13 . As such, Plaintiff's #14 Motion is denied as moot. The Court has also reviewed the #15 Revised Complaint, finding that it does not provide any reasonable basis for the Court to reconsider the dismissal of this case based upon res judicata. However, it appears from the docket that the #13 Order has yet to be mailed to Plaintiff, meaning he does not have notice that his case was closed. Accordingly, the Court will not consider these filings as grounds to impose sanctions upon Plaintiff, but repeats its admonition in the #13 Order to Plaintiff to refrain from any further filings in this case. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 06/11/2019. (Chen, C.)
|
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ABRI, Maria Satterwhite-Porpora, Charles Stallworth, filed by Stephen A. Miller.(Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Order to Expose Evidence by Stephen A. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER (attached), adopting and accepting Judge Merriam's #9 Recommended Ruling to the extent that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as barred by res judicata. Defendant's objections, Doc. #12 , are OVERRULED AND DENIED. Judge Merriam's Recommendation that Plaintiff be sanctioned in the form of an Injunction is DENIED FOR THE PRESENT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE to reconsideration by this Court as the result of changing circumstances. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 06/06/2019. (Chen, C.)
|
| Filing 12 OBJECTION to #9 Recommended Ruling filed by Stephen A. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's #10 Motion to Record the Just and Speedy Court Violations. Plaintiff's filing, stylized as a motion, is sufficient notice to preserve on the record his complaints alleging a "just and speedy" violation with respect to the Court's determination regarding his #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. A ruling on this "motion" is unneeded. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 05/28/2019. (Chen, C.)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Record the Just and Speedy Court Violations by Stephen A. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 9
RECOMMENDED RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court recommends that the Complaint be DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Court further recommends that the permanent injunction described in the attached ruling be issued. 14 Pages. This is a recommended ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1). Any objections to this recommended ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days of being served with this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to object within fourteen (14) days will preclude appellate review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a) and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2; Small v. Secretary of H.H.S., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam); F.D.I.C. v. Hillcrest Assoc., 66 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir. 1995). Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/21/19. (Dowie, C)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees, costs or security therefor, which includes an affidavit regarding his current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . In plaintiff's motion, he states that he has been unemployed since 2007. See id. at 3. Plaintiff has limited assets, and supports himself through the receipt of $1,026 in monthly government benefits, which leaves him with less than $100 in discretionary income each month. See id. at 3-5. Plaintiff has outstanding debt. See id. at 4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. In light of this order, plaintiff's #5 Motion to Expedite Fee Waiver is TERMINATED as moot. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/21/19. (Dowie, C)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER. This matter is also referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for review of the #1 Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 04/25/2019. (Chen, C.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for rulings on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #5 MOTION to Expedite. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 4/23/2019.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Expedite Fee Waiver by Stephen A. Miller. (Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 4/1/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/31/2019. Discovery due by 10/1/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 11/5/2019. Signed by Clerk on 4/1/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stephen A. Miller. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ABRI, Maria Satterwhite-Porpora, Charles Stallworth, filed by Stephen A. Miller.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
