Ketchum v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Shawn Ketchum
Defendant: Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Case Number: 3:2019cv00890
Filed: June 10, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Warren W Eginton
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert O. Hickey on behalf of Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (Hickey, Robert)
July 23, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Beck S. Fineman on behalf of Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (Fineman, Beck)
July 12, 2019 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint on Metro-North Commuter Railroad served on Robert O Hickey on 7/8/19, filed by Shawn Ketchum. (Kantor, Steven)
July 2, 2019 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Mike D on 6/14/19, filed by Shawn Ketchum. (Kantor, Steven)
June 11, 2019 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Steven Lawrence Kantor* *Kantor & Godwin, PLLC* *5800 Main Street* *Williamsville, NY 14221*. (Fazekas, J.)
June 11, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Shawn Ketchum, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 6/11/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 6/10/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 6/10/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/9/2019. Discovery due by 12/10/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2020. Signed by Clerk on 6/10/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
June 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5311118.), filed by Shawn Ketchum.(Kantor, Steven)
June 10, 2019 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company. (Kantor, Steven)
June 10, 2019 Judge Warren W. Eginton added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ketchum v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Represented By: Beck S. Fineman
Represented By: Robert O. Hickey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Ketchum
Represented By: Steven Lawrence Kantor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?