Hinson v. MacLean Associates, LLC

Plaintiff: Travis Hinson
Defendant: MacLean Associates, LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv00896
Filed: June 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Janet C Hall
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1601
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2019 Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Oliver, T.)
June 10, 2019 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to MacLean Associates, LLC. (Blinn, Daniel) Modified on 6/10/2019 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.).
June 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MacLean Associates, LLC ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5312210.), filed by Travis Hinson.(Blinn, Daniel) Modified on 6/10/2019 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hinson v. MacLean Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Hinson
Represented By: Daniel S. Blinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MacLean Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?