Cruz Berrios v. Saul
| Sandra Gisela Cruz Berrios |
| Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2019cv00942 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristina Cohn on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Cohn, Kristina) |
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 6/24/19.(Blue, A.)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Sandra Gisela Cruz Berrios, Andrew M. Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/24/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees, costs or security therefor, which includes an affidavit regarding her current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . In plaintiff's motion, she states that she has been unemployed since 2010. See id. at 2. She receives non-cash government benefits, including SNAP benefits and housing assistance. See id. at 3-5. Plaintiff has no assets, no income, and monthly expenses exceeding her government benefits. See id. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Additionally, Andrew M. Saul was confirmed as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on June 4, 2019. He is now the proper defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P 25(d); 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket accordingly. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 6/20/19. (Dowie, C)
|
| Filing 3 Consent NOTICE by Sandra Gisela Cruz Berrios Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction (Spat, Meryl) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 6/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Nancy A. Berryhill to 8/19/2019. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sandra Gisela Cruz Berrios. (Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Sandra Gisela Cruz Berrios. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Affidavit Application IFP)(Spat, Meryl) |
| Judge Stefan R Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
