Taylor v. Dorantes et al
Anna Taylor |
Department of Children and Families and Vanessa L. Dorantes |
3:2019cv01350 |
August 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Janet C Hall |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RECOMMENDED RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Court recommends that the #1 Complaint be DISMISSED, with prejudice, in part. If plaintiff disagrees with the recommendation set forth in this Ruling, she must file an objection on or before November 4, 2019.In the alternative, if plaintiff accepts the recommendations in this Ruling, she may choose to proceed on the Complaint, but only as to those claims the Court has found should proceed. If plaintiff elects to pursue this option, she may simply file a Notice on the docket requesting to proceed on these claims. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/16/2019. (Spangenburg, S.) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff has completed the required information. She asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having no employment and no assets. See generally id. at 3-4. Plaintiff also states that she receives monthly benefits, and that her monthly expenses far exceed her monthly income. See id. at 4-5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/16/2019. (Spangenburg, S.) |
Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for initial review of the Complaint #1 pursuant to 28 USC 1915. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/17/2019.Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Lewis, D) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/4/2019. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 7 Standing Order re: Discovery Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 08/30/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 6 ENTERED IN ERROR: Standing Order re: Discovery Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 08/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Attachment)(Murphy, Tatihana) Modified on 9/3/2019 (Murphy, Tatihana). |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 08/30/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 08/30/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/29/2019. Discovery due by 2/29/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 4/4/2020. Signed by Clerk on 08/30/2019.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anna Taylor. (Murphy, Tatihana) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Children and Families and Vanessa L. Dorantes, filed by Anna Taylor.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.