Stiber v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Julie A. Stiber |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2019cv02004 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Pro se plaintiff, Julia A. Stiber, filed her Complaint in this action on December 23, 2019, together with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See Doc Nos. 1 & 2. On January 6, 2020, Judge Sarah A.L. Merriam issued a Recommended Ruling denying the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint or supplement to her Complaint by January 27, 2020.On January 31, 2020, the court affirmed, adopted and ratified the Recommended Ruling, absent objection.The plaintiff having failed to file a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the court's filing fee, and having failed to file an amended complaint by January 27, 2020, this case is dismissed without prejudice to reopening if the plaintiff complies with the directives set forth in the Recommended Ruling. The Clerk is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/31/2020. (DeRubeis, B.)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Upon review and absent objection, the court affirms, adopts and ratifies #8 Recommended Ruling, denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/31/2020. (DeRubeis, B.)
|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Lewis, D) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Janet C. Hall for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 1/30/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 9
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 1/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
RECOMMENDED RULING denying #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling and Order, the Court recommends that plaintiff's #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED, without prejudice, in light of the apparent conflicts in the information provided to the Court. The Court further directs plaintiff to provide supplemental information regarding her complaint. Plaintiff shall review the attached Recommended Ruling and Order for details and deadlines. The attached is a recommended ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1). Any objections to a recommended ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). "Any party receiving notice of an order or recommended ruling from the Clerk by mail shall have five (5) additional days to file any objection." D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2(a). Plaintiff receives notice by mail. Accordingly, any objection must be filed on or before January 27, 2020. Failure to file an objection within this time frame will preclude appellate review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a) and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2(a); Small v. Secretary of H.H.S., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam); F.D.I.C. v. Hillcrest Assoc., 66 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir. 1995). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/6/2020. (Spangenburg, S.)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristina Cohn on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Cohn, Kristina) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Self-Represented Parties Signed by Clerk on 12/27/2019. (Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 12/23/2019. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 12/23/2019. (Reis, Julia)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 2/21/2020. (Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 3
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 12/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Julie A. Stiber. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam. (Reis, Julia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Julie A. Stiber. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
