In Re: Hazel
| Venetta Hazel |
| 3:2019mc00131 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Extension of Time for lack of jurisdiction. Because no Complaint has been filed, no civil action exists under 28 U.S.C. 1331 or 1332, and the Court thus lacks jurisdiction over this motion. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/8/2019. (Leon, Noel)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/6/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Extension of Time by Venetta Hazel. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing fee received from Venetta Hazel: $47.00, receipt number CTXH00016299. (Bozek, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: Hazel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Venetta Hazel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
