Grimes v. McDonald et al
Plaintiff: Darrell Grimes
Defendant: Roman, Jr., McDonald, John Doe and Ramos
Case Number: 3:2020cv00152
Filed: February 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 02/03/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 02/03/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 02/03/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRISCS - MOTION for Order Re Accommodations by Darrell Grimes. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 2/4/2020 to add prefix (Fazekas, J.).
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRISCS - MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Darrell Grimes. (Fazekas, J.)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISCS - MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Responses due by 2/24/2020, ) by Darrell Grimes. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Proposed Order)(Fazekas, J.)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Darrell Grimes. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 2/4/2020 to add prefix (Fazekas, J.).
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darrell Grimes. (Fazekas, J.)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against John Doe, McDonald, Ramos, Roman, Jr, filed by Darrell Grimes.(Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grimes v. McDonald et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrell Grimes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?