Headly v. Liberty Homecare Options, LLC et al
| Phyllis Headly |
| Lucia Devivo Catalano and Liberty Homecare Options, LLC |
| 3:2020cv00579 |
| April 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Lucia Devivo Catalano, Liberty Homecare Options, LLC.(Murphy, Peter)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 26, 2020 to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint #1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/16/2020. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Lucia Devivo Catalano to 6/26/2020; Liberty Homecare Options, LLC to 6/26/2020. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Extension of Time until June 26, 2020 to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint #1 Complaint by Lucia Devivo Catalano, Liberty Homecare Options, LLC. (Murphy, Peter)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Keegan A. Drenosky on behalf of Lucia Devivo Catalano, Liberty Homecare Options, LLC (Drenosky, Keegan)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Joseph Murphy on behalf of Lucia Devivo Catalano, Liberty Homecare Options, LLC (Murphy, Peter)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phyllis Headly. Lucia Devivo Catalano served on 5/29/2020, answer due 6/19/2020; Liberty Homecare Options, LLC served on 5/29/2020, answer due 6/19/2020. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 9
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Lucia DeVivo Catalano, Liberty Homecare Options, LLC on May 29, 2020, filed by Phyllis Headly. (Durkin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Lucia Devivo Catalano, Liberty Homecare Options, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Thomas J. Durkin* *The Hayber Law Firm, LLC* *750 Main Street Suite 904* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Liberty Homecare Options, LLC. (Durkin, Thomas)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Lucia Devivo Catalano. (Durkin, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT CASESNOT PLEADED AS COLLECTIVE ACTIONS Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 5/11/2020.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/29/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/29/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/28/2020; Discovery due by 10/29/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 12/3/2020. Signed by Clerk on 4/29/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
EXHIBITS to Complaint by Phyllis Headly re #1 Complaint - Civil cover sheet. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)This corrects entry #2 .(Walker, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
ENTERED IN ERROR - COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5829596.), filed by Phyllis Headly. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Headly Consent Form)(Durkin, Thomas) Modified on 4/30/2020 (Walker, J.).
|
|
Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5827566.), filed by Phyllis Headly.(Durkin, Thomas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
