Mitchell v. Saul
| Mitchell Victor and Victor Mitchell |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv00586 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| William I Garfinkel |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Victor Mitchell, Andrew M. Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/18/2020.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Victor Mitchell re #11 Order (Spat, Meryl) |
Filing 11
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/12/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Walker, Julia) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER terminating as moot #8 Motion to correct the caption. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/11/2020. (Caffrey, A.)
|
| Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Amend Caption. Responses due by 5/28/2020 (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend Caption - NOTICE by Victor Mitchell correct the caption (Spat, Meryl) Modified on 5/8/2020 (Oliver, T.). Modified on 5/11/2020 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff has completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having been unemployed since 2016 and having no assets. See id. at 3-4. Plaintiff also states that he receives "Food Stamps $193/month[.]" See id. at 3. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/30/2020. (Spangenburg, S.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/29/2020. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Scheduling Order Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/29/2020. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 3
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 6/29/2020. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Victor Mitchell. (Spat, Meryl) Modified on 4/29/2020 to correct motion (Hushin, Z.). Modified on 5/11/2020 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Victor Mitchell .(Spat, Meryl) Modified on 5/11/2020 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
