Madey v. USA, et al
William Carl Madley and William Carl Madey |
Michael J. Desmond, Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of IRS and USA |
3:2020cv00745 |
June 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by William Carl Madley, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 06/5/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 06/1/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 06/1/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2020. Discovery due by 12/1/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 1/5/2021. Signed by Clerk on 06/1/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of I.R.S., Michael J. Desmond, Internal Revenue Service, USA, filed by William Carl Madley.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.