McArthur v. Cargil et al
| Alexander McArthur |
| New Haven Police Department, Daryl Cargil and City of New Haven |
| 3:2020cv00967 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 USM 285 forms together with Summons and all instructions mailed to IFP plaintiff to complete and return to Clerk's office. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Alexander McArthur, #5 Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alexander McArthur Signed by Clerk on 9/4/2020.(Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Daryl Cargil, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Alexander McArthur* *456 Lombard Street* *Unit 105* *New Haven, CT 06513*. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 McArthur's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. McArthur has recently filed two dozen cases that are all pending before me. In each of those cases, McArthur has made a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Although McArthur does not include all relevant information in any one motion, I glean from all those motions that McArthur has been unemployed since 2009, see Mot. for IFP, Doc. No. 2, McArthur v. Yale New Haven Hospital, et al., No. 3:20-cv-998, has little-to-no real or personal property of value, see Mot. for IFP, Doc. No. 2, McArthur v. Cargil, et al., No. 3:20-cv-967, earns his only income, $783 per month, from social security, see id., and has monthly obligations totaling at least $343, see Mot. for IFP, Doc. No. 2, McArthur v. Alexis, et al., No. 3:20-cv-1159 (notably, that total does not include monthly expenditures on food and clothing). At this stage, McArthur's allegations are sufficient to establish that he is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. s. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, McArthur's motion to leave to proceed in forma pauperis, doc. no. #2 , is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/04/2020. (Rosenberg, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/13/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/13/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/11/2020 Discovery due by 1/12/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 2/16/2021 Signed by Clerk on 7/13/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alexander McArthur. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daryl Cargil, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department, filed by Alexander McArthur. Exhibits manually filed. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
