Genao v. Police Service Area 6 et al
| Elvin Genao |
| Police Service Area 6 and Federal Bureau of Investigations |
| 3:2020cv01017 |
| July 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). For the reasons explained in the accompanying ruling, the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 07/24/2020. (Mahler-Haug, A)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 7/21/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 7/21/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/19/2020 Discovery due by 1/20/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 2/24/2021 Signed by Clerk on 7/21/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elvin Genao. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigations, Police Service Area 6, filed by Elvin Genao. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
