Volkmar et al v. Leach et al
Peter T Volkmar and Daphne L Volkmar |
Thomas Leach, PV Holding Corp. doing business as Avis Budget Group Inc and United States Of America |
3:2020cv01168 |
August 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Motor Vehicle |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines/Hearings as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction .(Responses due by 10/13/2020, ) or ( Amended Complaint due by 10/13/2020) (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 11 ORDER: The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on September 22, 2020. (ECF No. 10.) On or before October 13, 2020, Plaintiff shall either file a response to the motion or file an amended complaint in which it pleads as many facts as possible, consistent with Rule 11, to address the alleged defects discussed in Defendant's memorandum of law. The Court will not allow further amendments after October 13, 2020. If Plaintiff chooses to amend and if Defendant renews its motion to dismiss, Defendant may incorporate by reference any prior briefing. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/25/20. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by United States Of America.Responses due by 10/13/2020 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Larson, John) |
Filing 9 ORDER: The motion to substitute defendant (ECF No. #8 ) is granted. Under 28 U.S.C. 2679(d)(2), the United States is substituted as a party defendant for Leach as the defendant for counts 1 and 3. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/21/20. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Substitute Party by Thomas Leach. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Scope of Employment, #2 Cdr Currie email)(Larson, John) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark A. Milano on behalf of Thomas Leach, PV Holding Corp. (Milano, Mark) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Notice (Other), filed by PV Holding Corp., Thomas Leach, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Protective Order, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Thomas Leach Signed by Clerk on 08/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/12/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/12/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/11/2020. Discovery due by 2/11/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 3/18/2021. Signed by Clerk on 08/12/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Thomas Leach, PV Holding Corp. of Pending Motions (Attachments: #1 Leach Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support, #2 Avis Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support, #3 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend and Defendants' Objection, #4 Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time re Discovery, #5 Plaintiffs' Motions for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss)(Larson, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Thomas Leach from Connecticut Superior Court, case number KNL-CV20-6046446-S., filed by Thomas Leach. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (State Court), #2 Scope Certification)(Larson, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.