Great Northern Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
| GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o Christopher Kraus and Darcy Stacom and Great Northern Insurance Company |
| Whirlpool Corporation and General Electric Company |
| 3:2020cv01842 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Attorney(s) Kyle W. LeClere to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6363155) by Whirlpool Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Rogers, Holly) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #13 Answer to Complaint, Crossclaim by Whirlpool Corporation.(Rogers, Holly) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Ann Boyce Iassogna on behalf of Great Northern Insurance Company (Iassogna, Patricia Ann) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Answer to Crossclaim and, CROSSCLAIM against Whirlpool Corporation by General Electric Company.(Kane, John) |
Filing 12
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Michael P. Shea for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/13/2021. (Reis, Julia)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by John Higgins Kane on behalf of General Electric Company (Kane, John) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and, CROSSCLAIM against General Electric Company by Whirlpool Corporation.(Rogers, Holly) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Whirlpool Corporation identifying Corporate Parent PRIMECAP Management Company, Corporate Parent Vanguard Group, Inc. for Whirlpool Corporation. (Rogers, Holly) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Whirlpool Corporation, #2 Notice (Other) filed by Whirlpool Corporation, #3 Notice (Other) filed by Whirlpool Corporation, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Standing Protective Order, #7 Standing Order re: Discovery Signed by Clerk on 12/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removals)(Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 7
Standing Order re: Discovery Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/11/2020. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/11/2020. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/11/2020. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/9/2021. Discovery due by 6/12/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 7/17/2021. Signed by Clerk on 12/11/2020. (Reis, Julia)
|
| Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Whirlpool Corporation NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH STANDING ORDER (Rogers, Holly) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Whirlpool Corporation NOTICE OF NO PENDING MOTIONS FILING (Rogers, Holly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Whirlpool Corporation from Bridgeport, CT, case number FBT-CV20-6102052-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6273476, filed by Whirlpool Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Return of Service, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Rogers, Holly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
