Mohamad v. Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc.
| Moein Mohamad |
| Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00152 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Discovery due by 11/12/2021; Dispositive Motions due by 12/30/2021; Joint Status Report due by 8/25/2021; Joint Trial Brief due by 2/18/2022; Telephonic Status Conference set for 9/1/2021 04:00 PM before Judge Michael P. Shea (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 19
SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court has reviewed the parties' (ECF No. 15) Rule 26(f) Report and orders the deadlines set forth in the attached. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/1/2021.(Gait, Emily)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER. The (ECF No. #17 ) motion for extension of time is GRANTED. The initial discovery response deadline is extended by thirty days. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/12/2021. (Gait, Emily)
|
| Filing 17 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until April 15, 2021 Initial Discovery Protocol Responses by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc.. (Brady, Kevin) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER: Initial Discovery Protocol Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/11/21.(Johnson, D.)
|
| Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Michaud, Megan) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc..(Brady, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Moein Mohamad. (Michaud, Megan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Emanuele Robert Cicchiello on behalf of Moein Mohamad (Cicchiello, Emanuele) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #8 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Certificate of Service filed by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc., #5 Notice of Appearance filed by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc., #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Notice (Other) filed by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc., #10 Notice, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc., #6 Notice of Appearance filed by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc., #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc., #9 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 02/08/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 10 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 02/05/2021. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Attachment) (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 02/05/2021. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 02/05/2021. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/6/2021. Discovery due by 8/7/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 9/11/2021. Signed by Clerk on 02/05/2021. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony S. Califano on behalf of Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. (Califano, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin R. Brady on behalf of Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. (Brady, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. of No Pending Motions (Brady, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, and Certificate of Filing (Brady, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Carrier Corporation for Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc.. (Brady, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. from Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven, Connecticut, case number NNH-CV-21-6110664-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6369517, filed by Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brady, Kevin) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mohamad v. Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Automated Logic Contracting Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Anthony S. Califano |
| Represented By: | Kevin R. Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Moein Mohamad | |
| Represented By: | Megan Leigh Michaud |
| Represented By: | Emanuele Robert Cicchiello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
