Simmons v. Sprout Foods, Inc. et al
Emily Simmons |
Sprout Foods, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and North Castle Partners |
3:2021cv00488 |
April 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MOTION for Attorney(s) Marisol C. Mork to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6535009) by Sprout Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Gregory, Mark) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Attorney(s) Adam R. Fox to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number BCTDC-6534986) by Sprout Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Gregory, Mark) |
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. #11 ). In light of the plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss as moot and without prejudice to the timely filing of any motion to dismiss as to the amended complaint. See Int'l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 556 F.2d 665, 668 (2d Cir. 1977). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/2/2021. (DeBot, B.) |
Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Class Action Complaint against All Defendants, filed by Emily Simmons.(Faircloth, Oren) |
Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Sprout Foods, Inc.. (Gregory, Mark) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Sprout Foods, Inc..Responses due by 5/27/2021 (Gregory, Mark) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sprout Foods, Inc.. (Gregory, Mark) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark S. Gregory on behalf of Sprout Foods, Inc. (Gregory, Mark) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of North Castle Partners Without Prejudice by Emily Simmons (Faircloth, Oren) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Emily Simmons. Sprout Foods, Inc. served on 4/15/2021, answer due 5/6/2021. (Faircloth, Oren) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Does, North Castle Partners, Sprout Foods, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Oren Faircloth* *Izard Kindall & Raabe, LLP* *29 South Main Street, Suite 305* *West Hartford, CT 06107*. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint, filed by Emily Simmons, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines. Signed by Clerk on 4/8/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/7/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/7/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/6/2021 Discovery due by 10/7/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 11/11/2021 Signed by Clerk on 4/7/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Emily Simmons, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6463105.), filed by EMILY SIMMONS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Faircloth, Oren) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Faircloth, Oren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.