Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 3:2021cv00865 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time of Pretrial Deadlines #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(James, Jacqueline) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to serve third party subpoena. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 7/2/21. (Barry, Donna) (Barry, Donna).
|
| Docket Entry Correction: PDF of order added to docket entry #9 . (Barry, Donna) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.Responses due by 7/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Report on Copyright Form, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #1 Complaint filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Protective Order, #5 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 6/25/2021.(Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/24/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/24/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/23/2021 Discovery due by 12/24/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 1/28/2022 Signed by Clerk on 6/24/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 3 AO 121 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Copyright Form Completed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6556493.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Cover Sheet)(James, Jacqueline) |
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline M. James |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
