Hill v. Saul
| Sheila Renee Hill |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00944 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 11/8/2021. (Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. In light of the length of the extension, the Court does not expect any further motions. But if counsel for the Commissioner deems such a motion to be necessary, it must (in addition to complying with Local Rule 7 in all respects) be accompanied by a statement of the status of the production of the administrative record in this case, as opposed to the status of her efforts to produce records generally. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 09/01/2021. (Farrish, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 11
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until November 8, 2021 the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Andrew Saul (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 9
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Sheila Renee Hill, Andrew Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/27/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
Consent NOTICE by Sheila Renee Hill Reference to Magistrate Judge (Rosner, Alan)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #3 . Plaintiff is not currently employed and reports that she receives government cash benefits, "Food Stamps[,]" and "public housing" assistance. Id. at 3-4. Plaintiff further asserts that she owns no assets and has minimal cash on hand. See id. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 7/13/2021. (Weis, Anne)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/9/2021. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/9/2021. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheila Renee Hill. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Alan L. Rosner on behalf of Sheila Renee Hill (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Sheila Renee Hill.(Reis, Julia)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 9/7/2021. (Reis, Julia)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
